Influence of Participation in Community and Social Development Projects on Beneficiaries’ Income in Ondo and Kwara States, Nigeria

Owolabi K. Elijah, Okunlola J. Olaniyi, Mafimisebi T. Ejiola

Abstract


The study determined the influence of participation in community social development projects on household income among beneficiaries in Ondo and Kwara states, Nigeria. Specifically, it determined the extent to which respondents were aware of community-driven development projects, the level to which respondents participated in the community-driven development project and influence of CDD approach on the income of beneficiaries in the study area. A simple random sampling was used to select 6 households in each of the non-benefiting communities, thus making a total of eighty-four (84) non-beneficiaries in the two states. Primary data was collected and analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.  The results show that 54.2 % of the respondents who benefitted from CSDP projects were males while 45.8% of them were females.  The findings also show that 56.0% and 36.9% were aware and very much aware of education projects respectively while only 4.8% were not aware. The CSDP projects implemented among the respondents include majorly health facility (64.3%), water facility (55.9%), education (52.9%), electricity (51.2%) and socio economic (47.0%). Other CSDP projects implemented in the communities were transported (36.9%), environment (35.1%) and gender and vulnerable group’s projects (27.9%). The study also revealed that the majority (86.3%) respondents had a very high level of participation water project with a mean value of (X ̅= 3.77) while only 2.6% had a very low level of participation. Furthermore, majority (70.6%) of the respondents had a very high level of participation in health projects (X ̅= 3.58) but the level of participation was low 5.2% of them. There was a 33.4 % increment in the mean annual income among the CDD beneficiaries (X ̅=₦166542.8).  The findings showed that there was a significant difference in income of beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries before and after the implementation of CDD projects in the study areas with a p-value 0f 0.000.  The study concluded that the CDD approach to community social development projects ensured positive outcomes of the community driven development projects

Keywords


Income; community; development; poverty

Full Text:

PDF XPS

References


Abimbola A. O.& Oluwakemi O. A. (2013). Livelihood Diversification and Welfare of Rural Households in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 5(12), 482–489.

Adedokun O.M., Adeyemo W.C., Olorunsola O.E (2010). The Impact of Communication on Community Development. Journal of Communication, 1(2), 101-105.

Adetimehin, O.D., Okunlola, J.O. & Owolabi, K.E. (2018). Utilization of Agricultural Information and Knowledge for Improved Production by Rice Farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 33(1), 76-100.

African Development Bank (2009). Country Partnership Strategy for the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2010-2013) July 2, 2009. Document of the World Bank.

Agwu, A.E & Abah, H.O (2009). Attitude towards Cost-Sharing in the Second National Fadama Development Projects (NFDP-II); the Case of Kogi State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 13 (2), 361-386.

Akangbe, J. A., Ogunyinka, W., Ayanda, I. F., Achem, B. & Adisa, R. S. (2012). An Assessment of effects of Fadama II project on livelihood of farmers in Orire. Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 8(1), 27-32.

De, J .A. & Sadoulet E. (2001). Income Strategies among Rural Households in Mexico. TheRole of off-Farm Activities, W. Dev., 29(3),467-480.

Dulle, F. W. & Aina L. O. (1999). “The Information Needs of Small Scale Dairy Farmers in Tanzania.”International Association of Association of Agricultural Information Specialists, Quarterly Bulletin 44(3-4), 173–6.

Ejiofor (2007): cited in Ibeawuchi, I. Echeme & Nwachukwu, C.C. (2010). An Investigation on the Impact of FADAMA II Project Implementation in Imo State. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, Science Huβ, http://www.scihub.org/AJSIRISSN:2153649Xdoi:10.5251/ajsir.2010.1.3.532.538.

Haggblade, S., Hazell P. & Reardon T. (2007). Transforming the Rural Non -Farm Economy. John Hopkins University Press Baltimore.

Matsumoto, T, Kijima Y Yamano T. (2006). The Role of Local Nonfarm Activities and Migration in Reducing Poverty: Evidence from Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 35,449-458.

National Population Commission (NBC), (2006). Estimated Population Figures, National Population Commission of Nigeria, Abuja.

Nkonya E. H. Markel ova, Kato E, Alomolaron A, Shetima A. G, Ingawa S. (2010). Baseline Report of Fadama III Impact Assessment Study. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC USA; 2010;. p.8.

Okwera, J. O (2014). An Assessment of the Role of Community Driven Development Project (CDD) on the Youth Empowerment in the Post War Conflict Situations: A Case Study of Akwang Sub-County, Kitgum District. Unpublished Phd. Thesis.

Petr M. (2013). The Making and Unmaking of Community-Based Water Supplies In Manila, Development in Practice, 23, 2, 217-231.

Ruben R, Van den Berg M (2001). Non-Farm Employment and Poverty Alleviation of Rural Households in Honduras. World Develop, 29(3), 549-560.

Sheree, B. & Alyoscia, D. (2014). Beyond Critique: Revised Approaches to Community-Driven Development. An Inception Paper 30th April 2014.

World Bank (2006). Youth in Community-Driven Development. Volume 1, Number 5 April 2006.

World Bank (2013): Community-Driven Development: Results Profile.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.006.03.2653

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Agricultural Extension



 

 

  

International Journal of Agricultural Extension

ISSN: 2311-6110 (Online), 2311-8547 (Print)

© ESci Journals Publishing. All Rights Reserved.