ENRICHMENT PREFERENCES OF RAPTORS AT ELMWOOD PARK ZOO

Elisa Tyler Tyler

Abstract


Environmental enrichment is often offered to animals in captivity to aid in enhancing quality of life by providing appropriate environmental stimuli that improve psychological and physiological well-being. Due to the limited amount of research conducted on raptors and enrichment, I sought to determine raptor preferences of enrichment types through the observation of captive bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) in the education department at Elmwood Park Zoo. I predicted that the raptors would interact more with natural enrichment items compared to ones that were man-made. Although results showed only the female bald eagle to interact enough with the enrichment items to gather an adequate number of observations, she was found to interact significantly more frequently with natural enrichment items compared to ones that were man-made (p < 0.0001, FET). These results are not meant to infer that all female bald eagles prefer natural enrichment items over man-made ones, or that all male bald eagles and female and male red-tailed hawks do not prefer any enrichment items. Nonetheless, they justify future research on environmental enrichment preferences involving many more individuals and many more taxa to determine more appropriate enrichment regimens for captive birds of prey.


Keywords


birds of prey; zoo; enrichment; preferences; behavior

Full Text:

PDF XPS

References


Ashokan, A., A. Hegde and R. Mitra. 2016. Short-term environmental enrichment is sufficient to counter stress-induced anxiety and associated structural and molecular plasticity in basolateral amygdala. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 69: 189-196.

Boal, C. W. and R. W. Mannan. 1998. Nest-Site Selection by Cooper's Hawks in an Urban Environment. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 62: 864.

GraphPad QuickCalcs: Fisher’s Calculator. 2015. GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Hediger, H. 2013. From Freedom to Captivity. Wild Animals in Captivity. Elsevier, pp. 27-30.

Mehrkam, L. R. and N. R. Dorey. 2015. Preference assessments in the zoo: Keeper and staff predictions of enrichment preferences across species. Zoo Biology, 34: 418-430.

Mellen, J. and M. Sevenich MacPhee. 2001. Philosophy of environmental enrichment: Past, present, and future. Zoo Biology, 20: 211-226.

Ohara, A., C. Oyakawa, Y. Yoshihara, S. Ninomiya and S. Sato. 2015. Effect of Environmental Enrichment on the Behavior and Welfare of Japanese Broilers at a Commercial Farm. The Journal of Poultry Science, 52: 323-330.

Powell, D. M. and J. T. Svoke. 2008. Novel Environmental Enrichment May Provide a Tool for Rapid Assessment of Animal Personality: A Case Study with Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 11: 301-318.

R, R. A. F., S. A. O, D. González‐Acuña and E. S. C. S. 2007. Nest characteristics of the Chilean Hawk (Accipiter chilensis, Falconiformes: Accipitridae) in an AndeanNothofagusforest of northern Patagonia. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 42: 1-4.

Rodríguez-López, R. 2016. Environmental enrichment for parrot species: Are we squawking up the wrong tree? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 180: 1-10.

Sullivan, B. L., E. L. Kershner, S. P. Finn, A. M. Condon, D. M. Cooper and D. K. Garcelon. 2011. Nest-site Characteristics of Red-tailed Hawks and Common Ravens on San Clemente Island, California. Journal of Raptor Research, 45: 252-256.

Swaisgood, R. R. and D. J. Shepherdson. 2005. Scientific approaches to enrichment and stereotypies in zoo animals: what's been done and where should we go next? Zoo Biology, 24: 499-518.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

Journal of Zoo Biology

© ESci Journals Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

.