INVESTIGATIONS ON DIFFERENT SEMEN EXTENDERS FOR COCKATIEL SEMEN

Helena Schneider, Dominik Fischer, Klaus Failing, Christine Ehling, Sabine Meinecke-Tillmann, Axel Wehrend, Michael Lierz

Abstract


The aim of the present study was the modification and evaluation of three different semen extenders for cockatiel semen in order to achieve a long survival time for transport, examination purpose and for potential cryopreservation, respectively. Therefore, individual and pooled semen samples of 30 cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) were investigated for pH and osmolality values and subsequently pH and osmolality values of the semen extenders were adjusted to those values in the semen. Pooled semen samples were then partitioned into four equal parts and diluted with the three different semen extenders in 1:4 and 1:8 dilution. 1 % glucose-Ringer’s solution was used as control, respectively. A total of 64 incremental diluted semen samples were obtained for investigation. Each dilution was investigated regarding sperm motility immediately after dilution and another four times every 30 minutes. Sperm viability was evaluated 0 and 120 minutes after dilution via eosin B-stain on the diluted semen samples and in pure semen samples. Additionally, the fluorescence stain SYBR® Green/propidium iodide was used to assess sperm viability. The results indicate that cockatiel spermatozoa are highly sensitive to variations in pH and osmolality, requiring adjustment of commercial diluents to pH = 7.42 and osmolality = 300 mOsm/kg. Modified Lake diluent maintained higher viability and motility than other diluents tested. Sperm morphology was indicated to be least adversely affected by modified Lake diluent in 1:4 concentration compared to other semen extenders and concentrations used.


Keywords


psittacine spermatozoa; parrots; semen analysis; sperm motility; assisted reproduction

Full Text:

ACCEPTED

References


Anderson, S. J., D. M. Bird, and M. D. Hagen 2002. Semen characteristics of the quaker parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus). Zoo Biology 21:507–512. doi: 10.1002/zoo.10060

Arndt, T. 1996. The complete lexicon of parrots. 1st edition. Arndt-Verlag, Bretten, Germany.

Bakst, M. R. 1980. Fertilizing capacity and morphology of fowl and turkey spermatozoa in hypotonic extender. Journal of reproduction and fertility 60:121–127. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0600121

Bakst, M. R., and J. S. Dymo 2013. Artificial Insemination in Poultry. In Success in Artificial Insemination - Quality of Semen and Diagnostics Employed. InTech. doi: 10.5772/54918

Bechstedt, U., K. Lohle, and R. Schramm 1974. Untersuchungen zur Verdünnung und Kurzzeitkonservierung von Hahnensperma. Monatshefte fur Veterinarmedizin 30:937 – 940.

Behncke, H. 2002. Spermagewinnung und –untersuchung sowie endoskopische Beurteilung des Geschlechtsapparats in Abhängigkeit von der Spermaproduktion bei Psittaziden am Beispiel des Wellensittichs (Melopsittacus undulatus). Veterinärmedizinische Fakultät Universität Leipzig.

Birkhead, T. R., J. G. Martínez, T. Burke, and D. P. Froman 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 266:1759–1764. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0843

Blanco, J., J. Long, G. Gee, A. Donoghue, and D. Wildt 2008. Osmotic tolerance of avian spermatozoa: Influence of time, temperature, cryoprotectant and membrane ion pump function on sperm viability. Cryobiology 56:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.09.004

Blanco, J. M., J. A. Long, G. Gee, D. E. Wildt, and A. M. Donoghue 2011. Comparative cryopreservation of avian spermatozoa: Benefits of non-permeating osmoprotectants and ATP on turkey and crane sperm cryosurvival. Animal Reproduction Science 123:242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.12.005

Blanco, J. M., J. A. Long, G. Gee, D. E. Wildt, and A. M. Donoghue 2012. Comparative cryopreservation of avian spermatozoa: Effects of freezing and thawing rates on turkey and sandhill crane sperm cryosurvival. Animal Reproduction Science 131:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.02.001

Blanco, J., D. Wildt, U. Hofle, W. Voelker, and A. Donoghue 2009. Implementing artificial insemination as an effective tool for ex situ conservation of endangered avian species. Theriogenology 71:200–213. doi:

1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.019

Blesbois, E., I. Grasseau, and D. Hermier 1999. Changes in lipid content of fowl spermatozoa after liquid storage at 2 to 5 degrees C. Theriogenology 52:325–334.

Blesbois, E., I. Grasseau, F. Seigneurin, S. Mignon-Grasteau, M. Saint Jalme, and M. M. Mialon-Richard 2008. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology 69:252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.019

Brock, M. K. 1991. Semen Collection and Artificial Insemination in the Hispaniolan Parrot (Amazona ventralis). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 22:107–114.

Bublat, A., D. Fischer, H. Schneider, S. Bruslund, M. Reinschmidt, and M. Lierz no date. unpublished data.

Collar, N. J., and S. H. M. Butchart 2014. Conservation breeding and avian diversity: chances and challenges. International Zoo Yearbook 48:7–28. doi: 10.1111/izy.12039

Dixon, W. J. 1993. BMDP Statistical Software Manual, Volume 1 and 2. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.

Fischer, D., D. Neumann, C. Purchase, T. Bouts, S. Meinecke-Tillmann, A. Wehrend, and M. Lierz 2014a. The use of semen evaluation and assisted reproduction in Spix’s macaws in terms of species conservation. Zoo Biology 33:234–244. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21129

Fischer, D., D. Neumann, A. Wehrend, and M. Lierz 2014b. Comparison of conventional and computer-assisted semen analysis in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) and evaluation of different insemination dosages for artificial insemination. Theriogenology 82:613–20. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.05.023

Froman, D. P. 2000. Sperm Mobility: Phenotype in Roosters (Gallus domesticus) Determinedby Concentration of Motile Sperm and Straight Line Velocity. Biology of Reproduction 62:303–309. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod62.2.303

Froman, D. P., A. J. Feltmann, M. L. Rhoads, and J. D. Kirby 1999. Sperm mobility: A primary determinant of fertility in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biology of reproduction 61:400–405. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.2.400

Giesen, A. F., and T. J. Sexton 1983. Beltsville Poultry Semen Extender: 7. Comparison of Commercial Diluents for Holding Turkey Semen Six Hours at 15 C,. Poultry Science 62:379–381. doi: 10.3382/ps.0620379

Holt, W. V. 2000. Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Animal Reproduction Science 62:3–22. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00152-4

Iaffaldano, N., M. P. Rosato, A. Manchisi, and G. Centoducati 2010. Comparison of different extenders on the quality characteristics of turkey semen during storage. Italian Journal of Animal Science. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2005.2s.513

IUCN 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatenend Species. (Online.) Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/.

Lake, P. E., and J. M. Stewart 1978. Preservation of fowl semen in liquid nitrogen—an improved method. British Poultry Science 19:187–194. doi: 10.1080/00071667808416462

Lierz, M., M. Reinschmidt, H. Müller, M. Wink, and D. Neumann 2013. A novel method for semen collection and artificial insemination in large parrots (Psittaciformes). Sci. Rep. 3:2066. doi: 10.1038/srep02066

Lüpold, S., S. Calhim, S. Immler, and T. R. Birkhead 2009. Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society 276 no. 16:1157–1181. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1645

Marvan, F., O. Rob, and E. Janecková 1981. Die Klassifikation morphologischer Spermienanomalien bei Gantern. Zuchthygiene 16:176–183.

Neumann, D., E. F. Kaleta, and M. W. Lierz 2013. Semen collection and artificial insemination in Cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) – A potential model for Psittacines. Tierarztliche Praxis 41 (K):101–105.

Nishiyama, H. 1951. Studies on the physiology of reproduction in the male fowl III. On the addition of transparent fluid to the cock’s semen. Science Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 13:377 – 387.

Quinn, J. P., and W. H. Burrows 1936. Artificial insemination in fowls. The Journal of Heredity:31–38.

Salamon, S., and W. M. C. Maxwell 2000. Storage of ram semen. Animal Reproduction Science 62:77–111. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00155-X

Samour, J. H. 2002. The Reproductive Biology of the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): Semen Preservation Techniques and Artificial Insemination Procedures. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 16:39–49. doi: 10.1647/10826742%282002%29016%5b0039%3atrbotb%5d2.0.co%3b2

Samour, J. H., J. A. Markham, H. D. M. Moore, and P. F. Watson 1988. Semen cryopreservation and artificial insemination in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Journal of Zoology 216:169–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb02422.x

Schramm, G. P., and K. Löhle 1984. Verdünnung und Flüssigkonservierung des Spermas – eine Möglichkeit zur Erhöhung der Effektivität der Zuchtarbeit und Rationalisierung der künstlichen Besamung beim Geflügel. Monatshefte fur Veterinarmedizin 40:135–138.

Sexton, T. J. 1977. A new poultry semen extender. 1. Effects of extension on the fertility of chicken semen. Poultry science 56:1443–1446. doi: 10.3382/ps.0561443

Siudzinska, A., and E. Lukaszewicz 2008. Effect of Semen Extenders and Storage Time on Sperm Morphology of Four Chicken Breeds. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 17:101–108. doi: 10.3382/japr.2007-00048

Snyder, N., P. McGowan, J. Gilardi, and A. Grajal 2000. Parrots: status survey and conservation action plan 2000 - 2004. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

Stelzer, G. 2004. Spermagewinnung, -untersuchung und -flüssigkonservierung bei verschiedenen Papageienvögeln (Psittaciformes). Veterinärmedizinische Fakultät der Universität Leipzig.

Verstegen, J., M. Iguer-Ouada, and K. Onclin 2002. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. In Theriogenology. pp. 149–179. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00664-1

WHO 2010. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th edition. World Health Organization Press, Geneva, Switzerland.

Wright, T. F., C. A. Toft, E. Enkerlin-Hoeflich, J. Gonzalez-Elizondo, M. Albornoz, A. Rodríguez-Ferraro, F. Rojas-Suárez, V. Sanz, A. Trujillo, S. R. Beissinger, V. B. A, et al. 2001. Nest Poaching in Neotropical ParrotsSaqueo de Nidos de Loros Neotropicales. Conservation Biology 15:710–720. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003710.x


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

Journal of Zoo Biology

© ESci Journals Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

.