The role of cooperation for sustainability innovations in the agriculture and food sector

Martina Schäfer, Bettina König

Abstract


The necessary transitions in the agriculture and food sector require ‘second order’ innovations, which often are the result of collaborative networks between heterogeneous partners. The paper is based on the analysis of cooperation in two different German case studies: One case deals with the development of a sustained value chain for ethical poultry production while the other case aims at the combination of different niche innovations for cultural landscape conservation. The empirical analysis is based on the categories ‘goals of the innovation and motives of cooperation’, ‘actors and their resources’, ‘distribution of costs and benefits’, ‘cooperation structure and management’. It comprises guided interviews with central actors of the co-operative networks and participative observation as part of a transdisciplinary research process. The comparison reveals similar and different challenges for establishing the two types of innovation, which can partly be explained by the different character of the niche-regime interactions in the two cases. Both face the challenge that partnerships have to be built up, which allow compensation of the added societal values. The establishment of ethical poultry production is confronted with competitive disadvantages of niche products on the market due to challenging the paradigm of specialization and cost efficiency on different levels of the value chain (divergent or oppositional niche-regime interaction). The case of cultural landscape preservation, which has characteristics of an emergent niche-regime interaction, is confronted with different perspectives on the aspired qualities of the landscape by the heterogeneous actors involved (agriculture, nature protection, tourism and ad-ministration). Both cases show a high degree of complexity, which affords professional cooperation management, which is able to adapt to changing circumstances. Drawing on the concept of “failures”, originating from the innovation system and transition approach, helps to get a better understanding of potentials and limits of cooperation in sustainable innovation processes..


Keywords


Sustainability innovations, cooperation management, ethical poultry production, organic value chains, cultural landscape conservation, marginal wetlands, niche-regime interaction, system failures.

Full Text:

PDF XPS

References


Anderson, C. R., L. Brushett, T. W. Gray, & H. Renting. (2014). Working together to build cooperative food systems, Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems and Community Development, 4(3), 3-9.

Brunori, G., D. Barjolle, A.-C. Dockes, S. Helmle, J. Ingram, L. Klerkx, H. Moschitz, G. Nemes & T. Tisenkopfs. (2013). CAP Reform and Innovation: The Role of Learning and Innovation Networks, EuroChoices, 12(2), 27–33.

Coughlan, P. & D. Coughlan. (2011). Collaborative Strategic Improvement through Network Action Learning. The Path to Sustainability. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.

Dyg, P.M. & B. E. Mikkelsen. (2016). Cooperation Models, Motivation and Objectives behind Farm–School Collaboration: Case Insights from Denmark, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 23(1), 41–62.

Fichter, K. & J. Clausen. (2013). Erfolg und Scheitern "grüner" Innovationen. Warum einige Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen am Markt erfolgreich sind und andere nicht. Marburg: Metropolis.

Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy (31), 1257–1274.

Goodman, D. (2004). Rural Europe redux? Reflections on alternative agro-food networks and paradigm change, Sociologia Ruralis, 44 (1), 3-16.

Grin, J., J. Rotmans, & J. Schot. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York, London: Routledge.

Ingram, J., D. Maye, J. Kirwan, N. Curry & K. Kubinakova. (2015). Interactions between Niche and Regime: An Analysis of Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture across Europe, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(1), 55-71.

Ingram, J. (2015). Framing niche-regime linkage as adaptation. An analysis of learning & innovation networks for sustainable agriculture across Europe, Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 59–75.

Klerkx, L. & N. Aarts. (2013). The interaction of multiple champions in orchestrating innovation networks: Conflicts and complementarities, Technovation, 33(6-7), 193–210.

Knickel, K., H. Renting & J. D. van der Ploeg. (2004). Multifunctionality in European Agriculture. In: F. Brouwer (ed.) Sustaining Agriculture and the Rural Economy: Governance, Policy and Multifunctionality. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 81-103.

Knickel, K., G. Brunori, S. Rand & J. Proost. (2009). Towards a Better Conceptual Framework for Innovation Processes in Agriculture and Rural Development: From Linear Models to Systemic Approaches, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15(2), 131–146.

Knickel, K., M. Redman, I. Darnhofer, A. Ashkenazy, T. Calvão Chebach, S. Šūmane, T. Tisenkopfs, R. Zemeckis, V. Atkociuniene, M. Rivera, A. Strauss, L.S. Kristensen, S. Schiller, M.E. Koopfmans & E. Rogge. (2018). Between aspirations and reality. Making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable, Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 197-210.

König, B., S. Lundie, A. Beblek., M. Busse, K. Diehl, J. Große-Lochtmann, A. Kuntosch, M. Mechler, C. Menne, B. Nölting, M. Petschick, M., A. Reinsberg, M. Schäfer, W. Schwerdtner, R. Siebert. (2015). Forschungsprojekte mit der Praxis entwickeln: Ergebnisse des Projektentwicklungsprozesses der Innovationsgruppe ginkoo. In: Häring, A.M., Hörning, B., Hoffmann-Bahnsen, R. (Hg.): Beiträge zur 13. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Am Mut hängt der Erfolg: Rückblicke und Ausblicke auf die ökologische Landbewirtschaftung, 1–13.

König, B., B. Nölting, M. Schäfer & L. Wortmann. (2017). Method for managing transdisciplinary research: using the situation analysis approach for a joint problem framing. IST 2017: Taking the lead in real world transitions, 8th International Sustainability Transitions Conference, 18-21 June 2017, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Lacombe, C., N. Couix & L. Hazard. (2018). Designing agro-ecological farming systems with farmers: A review, Agricultural Systems 165, 208–220.

Leach, M., J. Rockström, P. Raskin, I. Scoones, A.C. Stirling, A. Smith. (2012). Transforming Innovation for Sustainability, Ecology and Society, 17 (2).

Levidow, L. (2015). European transitions towards a corporate-environmental food regime: Agroecological incorporation or contestation?, Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 76–89.

Marsden, T. & E. Smith. (2005). Ecological entrepreneurship: sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding, Geoforum, 36(4), 441–451.

Maye, D. (2013). Moving Alternative Food Networks beyond the Niche, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 20(3), 383–389.

Moschitz, H., D. Roep, G. Brunori & T. Tisenkopfs. (2015). Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture: Processes of Co-evolution, Joint Reflection and Facilitation, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(1), 1-11.

Nölting, B. & M. Schäfer. (2016). Cooperation management as a distinct function in innovation processes for alternative food production and consumption - potentials and limitations. Paper for the 12th European IFSA Symposium, 12th till 15th of July 2016.

Papa, E., A. Koutsouris, J. Ingram, L. Debruyne, H. Cooreman & F. Marchand. (2018). Structural aspects of on-farm demonstrations: Key considerations in the planning and design process. 13th IFSA Symposium, 1-5 July 2018 Chania, Greece.

Prager, K. & R. Creaney. (2017). Achieving on-farm practice change through facilitated group learning: Evaluating the effectiveness of monitor farms and discussion groups, Journal of Rural Studies, (56),1–11.

Reuter, K. (2014). Vermeintlich wertlos. Alternativen zum millionenfachen Töten von Küken, Kritischer Agrarbericht: 234–240.

Schermer, M., H. Renting & H. Oostindie. (2011). Collective farmers’ marketing initiatives in Europe: Diversity, contextuality and dynamics, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 18(1),1-11.

Sutherland, L.-A.; L. Madureira, V. Dirimanova, M. Bogusz, J. Kania, K. Vinohradnik, (2017). New knowledge networks of small-scale farmers in Europe’s periphery, Land Use Policy, (63), 428–439.

Swoboda, B. (2003). Kooperation: Erklärungsperspektiven grundlegender Theorien, Ansätze und Konzepte im Überblick. In: J. Zentes, B. Swoboda & D. Morschett (eds) Kooperationen, Allianzen und Netzwerke: Grundlagen – Ansätze – Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 35-64.

Sydow, J. (ed.). (2010). Management von Netzwerkorganisationen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Tidd, J. & J. Bessant. (2013). Managing Innovation. Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 5th edition.: Wiley.

Van der Ploeg, J.D., H. Renting, G. Brunori, K. Knickel, J. Mannion, T. Marsden, K. De Roest, E. Sevilla Guzman & F. Ventura. (2000). Rural Development: From Practices and Policies Towards Theory, Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 391-408.

Weber, K. & M. Rohracher. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change, Research Policy, 41 (6),1037–1047.

Weyer, J. (2011). Zum Stand der Netzwerkforschung in den Sozialwissenschaften. In: J. Weyer (ed.) Soziale Netzwerke: Konzepte und Methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen Netzwerkforschung. München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 39-69.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

  

International Journal of Agricultural Extension

ISSN: 2311-6110 (Online), 2311-8547 (Print)

© ESci Journals Publishing. All Rights Reserved.